[0:26:25 - 0:26:37] So who's behind it? That's fine if you don't want to consider that option. It's either
Russian, Chinese or ours. And it's not ours. We've already said it's not ours. We don't have that capability.
[0:26:37 - 0:26:46] And we damn sure hope it's not
Russian or Chinese because then we're really screwed. No, by the way, we've been dealing with this topic now for the last what 70 some years. Can you imagine?
[0:27:39 - 0:27:55] Who had that capability at the time if we didn't well. Where was
Russia? They were just entering the atomic age themselves China. They're in the middle of a famine. Right. So there's no one who had that capability. I always use a analogy. That would be like like going back into the 40s.
[0:30:38 - 0:31:07] So people said, well, why would they spend? But look, our country did. But one of my colleagues, how put off the Godfather of the US government, the CIA's psychic espionage program. That's right. They just said psychic espionage program. Your tax dollars paid for programs like Stargate and Grillflame before that and various other names before that. Why? Because there was some information to suggest that it worked. And oh, by the way, the
Russians were doing the same thing. You know, so people, people look at the US government.
[0:31:07 - 0:31:31] People look at things and say, well, that's silly. That would never work. And it turns out that sometimes it does work. Look at the Navy, so the Navy guy, the Navy, so says program back in the 50s. Who would have ever thought, well, I just dropped some microphones on the ocean and maybe I can listen to
Russian submarines. It works. Right. So is it really that? Is it pseudo science? Well, the pseudoscience until it works. Now it's your science.
[0:33:16 - 0:33:29] There was no real near peer other than the
Russians at the time. And they were still nowhere near what we were able to do. So I can buy now if you say that there is a foreign adversary that has his capability.
[0:36:05 - 0:36:22] So it simply doesn't make sense from a time perspective that some country had this technology 70 years ago. Now, sure, maybe I doubt it, but I would buy that more that OK, yeah, China
Russian the last five years has been able to develop this.
[0:39:51 - 0:40:11] So I think there's a, you know, there's an argument there to be made that, you know, obviously I would rather this technology be ours and
Russian or Chinese, but I think we're pretty clear now as a government. It's not our technology and our government has already said for the record. Very senior people. This is not our technology.
[1:11:34 - 1:11:40] Like again, remote viewing program with Stargate, right? We actually did that against the
Russian.
[1:35:11 - 1:35:16] successfully located a down
Russian supersonic test plane that was being flown in a crash
[1:35:20 - 1:35:25] find it in other countries of the
Russians. Who found it? Remote viewers. Look at the story behind
[1:39:30 - 1:39:39] remote viewer where their target was a
Russian submarine. And they were providing the description
[1:39:43 - 1:39:47] was one of the latest new submarines that the
Russians was deploying. And this was general.
[1:42:58 - 1:43:05] not a president. And he sided with the
Russians. And that was a problem. So my father basically
[2:01:00 - 2:01:03] counterintelligence and security aspect for the portfolio because they're worried that the
Russians
[2:01:08 - 2:01:16] program. Yeah, the
Russians don't want to know. So very shortly thereafter, I realized the true
[2:01:46 - 2:01:50] And think about that, right? Our restricted ability to launch if we're attacked by the
Russian,
[2:02:28 - 2:02:33] that the same thing happened in
Russia, but there, they were turned on to a ready position.
[2:23:19 - 2:23:23] lost a drone and it's paraded like the
Russians did with the YouTube back in the 1960s when we're
[2:23:23 - 2:23:28] flying the YouTube over Mother
Russia? No, that's a PR disaster. So there's a lot of things that are
[2:30:36 - 2:30:45] How close are, I mean, what is, how concerned are you that China,
Russia, Iran, name,
[2:31:01 - 2:31:06] Russian China. China has already announced through the Five Contents initiative
[2:31:38 - 2:31:42] Russia has had a long history and it's in fact right after the Berlin wall fell down
[2:31:47 - 2:31:50] and
Russia where that happened, the ball came down. But it actually, you may have been too young.
[2:32:07 - 2:32:14] some names, program names that the
Russians were involved with involving UAP and, and
[2:32:18 - 2:32:25] a tip, we had a lot of that, that intel available to us. So we know for a fact,
Russia and China,
[2:33:22 - 2:33:27] other nations? I'm sorry, I'm forgetting. We're more, we're sharing files with
Russia or
[2:36:24 - 2:36:29] places. And you had a nuke, real nuke issue,
Russians had nuke, we had nuke, so we're building more
[2:36:36 - 2:36:40] here's this real threat from
Russia. And then you've got this other thing going on here that
[2:37:20 - 2:37:24] The
Russian agreement we had, the treaty with the
Russians that we would not fly manned
[2:37:24 - 2:37:29] reconnaissance missions over mainland
Russia. And what did we do? We did the exact opposite. We
[2:37:37 - 2:37:44] Russians didn't respond. Mission success. They didn't even know we were there. Or did they?
[2:37:45 - 2:37:51] It wasn't until the
Russians were able to develop and deploy the S-A-2 surface-to-air missile
[2:37:59 - 2:38:05] front of the United Nations the
Russians ever admit that they were tracking every single flight.
[2:38:05 - 2:38:11] It wasn't until they could neutralize the threat that they ever admit even to the
Russian people