[0:03:10 - 0:03:16] shadowy US intelligence apparatuses. But does
the Navy just retrieve UFO in USOs
[0:09:24 - 0:09:30] redacting all information about
the Navy, NURRO, Woods Hole, NGA, NURRO, JSOC, etc.
[0:13:19 - 0:13:26] the non-human materials on which the program's focus.
The Navy employees numerous U-Arcs and FFRDCs
[0:14:55 - 0:15:00] according to the testimony of Randy Anderson,
the Navy, specifically the Naval Service Warfare Center
[0:15:06 - 0:15:12] at the Underground Off-World Technologies Division.
The Navy also engages in a tremendous roster of
[0:15:44 - 0:15:50] in this investigation, it is paramount to recognize
the Navy has indeed participated in at least one
[0:22:25 - 0:22:31] with Secretary of
the Navy John Warner as its first director. The office served as a means of
[0:24:32 - 0:24:39] run in Scandinavian waters by NRO whilst directed by Secretary of
the Navy John Lehman from 1981 to
[0:25:22 - 0:25:28] but by 1972
the Navy regained some control of NRO seen Secretary of
the Navy John Warner
[0:25:28 - 0:25:34] serve as its director. However through NRO
the Navy and CIA DSNT's usage of the Glomar
[0:27:00 - 0:27:06] and touch on how I believe NRO provided transportation and logistics assets to
the Navy's project
[0:27:30 - 0:27:35] launched the Deepse Emergent Systems project which saw
the Navy drastically improve deep sea
[0:29:27 - 0:29:33] SAIC locations. And of course Inman's dual roles within US intelligence and
the Navy also suits
[0:31:35 - 0:31:40] Secretary of
the Navy to director of naval intelligence. Also recall how Inman states he was exposed
[0:45:11 - 0:45:17] the Navy, where it develops technology including ocean battle space sensors, unmanned undersea vehicles,
[0:45:59 - 0:46:05] Navy Oceanographic Research Laboratory for the Department of
the Navy. This WHOI lab is now part
[0:48:43 - 0:48:47] Mark would form a friendship with a lieutenant in
the Navy who would go on to become a commander
[0:50:34 - 0:50:40] with disabled submarines.
The Navy conducted numerous exercises with DSRVs-1 and-2, but no
[0:50:55 - 0:51:01] Deep Semergence Systems Project, DSSP, to increase and develop
the Navy's deep ocean engineering
[0:51:01 - 0:51:07] capabilities. The project was initially founded out of
the Navy Special Program Office and DSRV's
[0:51:36 - 0:51:40] Chief Scientist of the Special Programs Office of
the Navy and first head of the DSSP,
[0:54:52 - 0:54:58] So now the question must be asked was Sand Dollar
the Navy's first UFO legacy program designated
[0:55:19 - 0:55:26] End quote. From the DSSP,
the Navy plan to build six DSRV units and additional DSRVs known as
[1:09:40 - 1:09:45] Remember back to the words of Dr. John P. Craven chief scientist of
the Navy Special
[1:10:09 - 1:10:14] Systems project DSSP which aimed to increase and develop
the Navy's deep ocean engineering
[1:14:23 - 1:14:29] even state
the Navy housed by logics such as in 1975 when Lieutenant Colonel X claimed quote
[1:18:59 - 1:19:06] Great Lakes Naval Station was shot down by
the Navy between Hawaii and the mainland in June of 1973.
[1:19:48 - 1:19:53] If this story is true, this means
the Navy, CIA, and intelligence organizations such as Nuro
[1:21:11 - 1:21:17] Naval Support Facility in Diego Garcia, he was exposed to
the Navy conducting sensitive operations
[1:22:38 - 1:22:45] can only find snippets of. The first ever mention I can find of
the Navy Special Program is in a 1974
[1:23:15 - 1:23:21] Now since Nuro was created between
the Navy and CIAD S&T, you may think Navy Special Program refers
[1:23:21 - 1:23:27] to Nuro. However,
the Navy Special Program is itself a very real office. Indeed,
the Navy Special
[1:23:50 - 1:23:54] Here we get a keen look at the organizational structure of
the Navy Special Program.
[1:23:54 - 1:23:59] The Navy Special Program was once designated to run parallel to the National Reconnaissance
[1:24:09 - 1:24:16] the Navy Special Program seen as he himself served as former ASD slash I. The NSP, according to
[1:24:39 - 1:24:44] Therefore, with
the Navy Special Program acting as an umbrella office for numerous Navy
[1:25:06 - 1:25:12] under
the Navy Special Program Office. This process for Naval UFO legacy programs would likely remain
[1:25:19 - 1:25:25] Facilities by
the Navy Special Program Central Office. Naval legacy programs hidden within the NSP
[1:25:41 - 1:25:47] encounter them or was not briefed during his prestigious position within
the Navy. We can find one
[1:25:47 - 1:25:53] intriguing acknowledged CIA program that likely utilized
the Navy Special Program, Project
[1:26:00 - 1:26:05] served as the technical director of
the Navy Special Program Office, where he provided naval
[1:26:27 - 1:26:33] technical director of
the Navy Special Program Office. And as the executive director of the intelligence
[1:27:03 - 1:27:09] potte's connection to
the Navy Special Program Office. According to excellent researcher Jeff Crookshank,
[1:29:04 - 1:29:11] the aforementioned Gene Patete. Historically,
the Navy special program saw heavy compartmentalization
[1:29:27 - 1:29:32] overlapping certain compartmented areas of
the Navy special program. For read-on access,
[1:30:07 - 1:30:12] from the Secretary of
the Navy John Layman concerning
the Navy special program. Remembered,
[1:30:33 - 1:30:38] UFO legacy operations. The work here on
the Navy special program is just the beginning for me and
[1:30:50 - 1:30:55] served for three years as a diver in
the Navy special program with the mobile diving and salvage unit
[1:31:08 - 1:31:14] Chris Sharp regarding USO retrievals
the Navy and so calm especially intriguing scene as sharp
[1:31:33 - 1:31:38] security officer for
the Navy special program and please understand I am protecting the identity
[1:32:04 - 1:32:12] as has majorly exploit has
the Navy successfully created C-faring ARV a deep C equivalent to the
[1:33:07 - 1:33:13] dive into how legacy operations within
the Navy are funded I have spoken before on witness Ed who
[1:34:03 - 1:34:09] clandestine UFO programs may have also occurred in
the Navy and we may get a keen look at such an
[1:34:21 - 1:34:29] corporation $660 a piece for ash trays to be included in the E2C Hawkeye
the Navy only began to
[1:34:40 - 1:34:45] investigation it had also been determined
the Navy was paying crumman $400 per socket wrench that
[1:34:45 - 1:34:51] were used to adjust the seats of F-14s and
the Navy had also increased payments for ground locks
[1:35:00 - 1:35:08] the Navy had been charging itself $954 for ash trays for such infractions defense secretary
[1:36:56 - 1:37:01] why is this is it because
the navy deals with weapons technology as in the randy Anderson case
[1:37:07 - 1:37:13] or is it because
the navy specifically the on and r is a pristine stop for craft or is it because
[1:44:10 - 1:44:16] statements and i know i say this in most videos but our work with
the navy is really just beginning
[1:44:22 - 1:44:28] because
the navy and if chris sharp reporting is correct the oh and r specifically is almost a
[1:44:40 - 1:44:46] transported again does
the navy just satisfy naval uf o legacy programs for storage of craft or do