[0:00:05 - 0:00:10] in the United States, Deputy Directorate CIA, Director of
Naval Intelligence, and a variety
[0:03:40 - 0:03:45] explore in this project, I theorize
naval UFO programs can be delegated to four
[0:03:51 - 0:03:55] operations are likely conducted out of the Office of
Naval Research and Office of
[0:04:05 - 0:04:09] Reconnaissance Office and Navy Special Program and involve US
naval stations
[0:04:25 - 0:04:29] will explore in tremendous detail the three components of
naval UFO programs I
[0:04:41 - 0:04:46] naval UFO programs, monitor, will be largely emitted from today's exploration.
[0:04:59 - 0:05:04] a
naval regulation restricting maritime UFO reporting. With that being said, let
[0:05:04 - 0:05:10] us look beyond the veil to analyze
naval UFO legacy programs. Hey guys, it's
[0:05:28 - 0:05:32] investigation, we will analyze the alleged structure of
naval UFO programs, study
[0:05:37 - 0:05:43] intriguing USO retrieval cases and identify
naval installations alleged to hold
[0:10:57 - 0:11:02] the Office of
Naval Research, which subsequently hands them over to defense contractors for detailed
[0:12:19 - 0:12:25] Naval UFO program, craft would be taken to various Office of
Naval Research locations before
[0:14:38 - 0:14:44] And by the way, as recently as 2013, the Office of
Naval Research has displayed a keen interest in
[0:14:55 - 0:15:00] according to the testimony of Randy Anderson, the Navy, specifically the
Naval Service Warfare Center
[0:15:12 - 0:15:19] programs with FFRDC's well worth our interest. Primarily the Center for
Naval Analysis run by the
[0:19:55 - 0:20:01] not our focus for
naval legacy programs. The NRO was born based on a recommendation to President
[0:20:26 - 0:20:32] in
Naval, USO retrievals are scanned. Seen as NRO is a classified Black agency but we will do
[0:25:10 - 0:25:16] science and technology and office of
naval intelligence quote from the day NRO was formed the CIA
[0:28:00 - 0:28:11] Naval Intelligence 13 September 1974. Brand new flag selectee that year. I also had a second hat
[0:28:31 - 0:28:38] oceans. Bobby Ray Inman allows us an extremely rare opportunity to understand
Naval UFO slash
[0:29:11 - 0:29:15] Green Beret Randy Anderson as running the off-world technologies division below the
Naval [0:30:25 - 0:30:31] Naval Intelligence and director of NRO whose very existence was still classified. In Inman's own
[0:31:30 - 0:31:35] NRO dealt with technology acquisition and was also a high ranking
naval official ranging from
[0:31:35 - 0:31:40] Secretary of the Navy to director of
naval intelligence. Also recall how Inman states he was exposed
[0:32:53 - 0:32:58] Until recently with the openness of Admiral Timothy Gallaudet
naval officials quite often denied
[0:32:58 - 0:33:05] the existence of UFO. This dates all the way back to 1951 where the office of
naval research physicist
[0:34:00 - 0:34:06] Naval Intelligence and a variety of intelligence posts a very technologist and clearly someone
[0:38:01 - 0:38:08] former director of
Naval Intelligence Sumner Shapiro. It is unknown if like Inman Shapiro served on
[0:38:13 - 0:38:19] group that managed UFO information and at this time Shapiro was retired as director of
Naval [0:39:46 - 0:39:51] me to the current director of
Naval Intelligence. He decided to terminate the meeting at that point,
[0:39:57 - 0:40:01] Eschler and insights he gained from senior
Naval officials, Eschler would also claim Navy
[0:40:01 - 0:40:08] EMP experiments were utilized out of Pensacola
Naval Air Station to down UFOs for retrievals.
[0:40:14 - 0:40:21] only
Naval officials who have spoken on UFO legacy programs. In 2021, now deceased former Navy
[0:46:05 - 0:46:11] of the
Naval Research Laboratory NRL. However, the National Oceanographic Research Laboratory was
[0:46:19 - 0:46:24] quite often. Present day, Woods Hole also manages projects for the Office of
Naval Research,
[0:46:37 - 0:46:43] we can find some data of extreme interest, such as National Defense R&D Services with the
Naval [0:47:39 - 0:47:44] integrate, evaluate and support unmanned undersea vehicles specifically for the
Naval [0:50:16 - 0:50:22] truck, C5 Galaxy, or
Naval vessel to piggyback, efficient routes to rescue crews of stranded
[0:52:29 - 0:52:34] intelligence briefing by a
Naval Intelligence Officer and was informed on the existence of an
[0:54:26 - 0:54:31] naval deep sea diving and engineering capabilities to retrieve undersea objects discovered by an
[0:57:41 - 0:57:47] vessel equipped with a side scan determined a vessel to be resting on the sea floor.
Naval authorities
[1:09:06 - 1:09:11] the retrieval by the
Naval Lieutenant Colonel and Mark told Bell he would connect him with the
Naval [1:09:11 - 1:09:16] Officer. I am still trying to chase down this case with the help of some high profile
naval [1:11:44 - 1:11:49] Chris Sharper are correct water-based USO and UFO recoveries are stationed at
naval [1:11:49 - 1:11:54] installations and locations of the Office of
Naval Research where they are then utilized in
[1:12:00 - 1:12:05] down-craft stored at
naval installations. We will reference numerous sources here including
[1:12:40 - 1:12:46] Naval Air Station Sunnyvale California disappeared out of sight while serving at the
Naval installation
[1:13:31 - 1:13:37] facility the Colonel would attend weekly commanders calls at the
Naval Air Station in New Brunswick
[1:13:49 - 1:13:53] serve at the Brunswick
Naval Air Station at this time and was the commanding officer of the
[1:14:29 - 1:14:35] bodies are now being flown outside of the US to a secret
naval installation on an island in the
[1:15:36 - 1:15:42] is similar to OPNAC which is the Office of the Chief of
Naval Operations while BBS is the
[1:15:55 - 1:16:01] This story took place at the
Naval Air Base Yuma Arizona now called the Marine Corps Air Station Yuma
[1:16:41 - 1:16:47] Witness Pete, a former US Marine, claimed to have photographed a saucer-like craft at the
Naval [1:17:22 - 1:17:29] to the Great Lakes
Naval Base in Northern Illinois in 1973. While we discuss this case do keep in mind
[1:17:29 - 1:17:35] the Office of
Naval Research has a major Chicago Department less than 40 miles away from the Great Lakes
[1:17:35 - 1:17:42] Naval Station. Our encounter comes from one witness R.K. an E4 grade instructor in gunnery school
[1:17:42 - 1:17:49] at the Great Lakes
Naval Base from March 1973 to September 1974 destined for intelligence school.
[1:18:07 - 1:18:14] Naval Base with orders not to let anybody within 100 yards. While on duty R.K. was approached by
[1:18:14 - 1:18:20] a
naval officer who handed him a sealed envelope to deliver to the commander in the quan set hut.
[1:18:59 - 1:19:06] Great Lakes
Naval Station was shot down by the Navy between Hawaii and the mainland in June of 1973.
[1:19:41 - 1:19:48] of significant consequence here. Glomar was run by Nuro, a joint
naval and CIA DSNT effort.
[1:20:10 - 1:20:14] Other cases of
naval bases and the Office of
Naval Research possessing both
[1:20:20 - 1:20:26] rep, J. Andrew Kisner, stated sources within White Sands Proving Ground in the
Naval Research Lab
[1:20:43 - 1:20:50] FFRDC and U-Wark to exploit UFO materials. According to Kisner's
naval sources, the UFO
[1:21:00 - 1:21:05] the Research and Development Board ran by Dr. Vannevar Bush and the
Naval Research Lab.
[1:21:11 - 1:21:17] Naval Support Facility in Diego Garcia, he was exposed to the Navy conducting sensitive operations
[1:22:31 - 1:22:38] Navy Special Program, or NSP. The NSP is a highly elusive
naval office that's similar to Nuro we
[1:23:27 - 1:23:33] Program Office serves as an umbrella control system for several
naval clandestined undersea operations.
[1:24:56 - 1:25:01] the Office of
Naval Research locations. To then be studied by federal elements and defense
[1:25:06 - 1:25:12] under the Navy Special Program Office. This process for
Naval UFO legacy programs would likely remain
[1:25:19 - 1:25:25] Facilities by the Navy Special Program Central Office.
Naval legacy programs hidden within the NSP
[1:25:36 - 1:25:41] record that while Stia's aware of testimony of
naval UFO legacy programs, he did not directly
[1:26:00 - 1:26:05] served as the technical director of the Navy Special Program Office, where he provided
naval [1:26:17 - 1:26:22] executive. He, quote, provided scientific expertise on space and
naval reconnaissance systems in
[1:26:38 - 1:26:45] 1960s with heavy use of
naval assets, ships, and submarines. The project employed a variety of
[1:29:51 - 1:29:57] Navy rear admiral and director of
Naval Intelligence John Butts. The memo thanks John for his personal
[1:31:26 - 1:31:32] contacted one Mr. W. H who served for two years as an office of
Naval intelligence chief information
[1:31:47 - 1:31:53] Believe it or not today we have only scratched the surface of
Naval UFO legacy programs.
[1:31:53 - 1:31:58] In the beginning of this project I separated
Naval legacy programs into four distinct categories
[1:32:17 - 1:32:23] Navy special program office an office of
Naval research conducting under C UFO and USO crash
[1:32:29 - 1:32:36] organization such as the NRO NRO and CIA DSNT we have also discussed myriad senior
naval officials
[1:32:48 - 1:32:55] FFRDC's
Naval U-Arcs and DOD RDT&E facilities that are highly likely involved with
Naval UFO
[1:35:26 - 1:35:31] looking into larger
naval contracts and discovered for example profits on aircraft carrier
[1:36:04 - 1:36:11] exploitation programs so after all of this today has mostly served as an expose into
naval legacy
[1:36:17 - 1:36:24] naval and special us oh legacy programs this is due to multiple sources of mine informing me navy
[1:39:23 - 1:39:29] identify mark to try to identify the
naval lieutenant commander and trying to track down those
[1:43:13 - 1:43:20] naval station case of course stringfield published on this back in the 80s so the glomar explorer
[1:44:35 - 1:44:40] a craft or the army if they retrieve a craft do they initially stage at
naval locations to then be
[1:44:40 - 1:44:46] transported again does the navy just satisfy
naval uf o legacy programs for storage of craft or do