[0:00:00 - 0:00:12] After one of the hypnosis sessions, Betty drew from memory a sketch of a
star map that
[0:01:16 - 0:01:21] The two largest
stars appeared to be just objects in the foreground, therefore they showed
[0:01:26 - 0:01:31] There were heavy lines running between these two
stars, indicating heavy traffic trade
[0:01:34 - 0:01:40] There were solid lines going out to several other
stars where they apparently traveled
[0:01:50 - 0:01:56] Years later, Marjorie Fish and Ohio School Teacher decided to take the
star map and to
[0:01:56 - 0:02:03] see if it matched reality, to see if there really was a 12
star pattern like this in the
[0:02:04 - 0:02:12] Now, later, in the research of the
star map, I was contacted by a school, at that time,
[0:02:36 - 0:02:43] She
started out and she put our solar system in the middle and
started working out so many
[0:02:44 - 0:02:51] So over a period of six years, she built three-dimensional models of the Sun's neighborhood of
stars
[0:02:53 - 0:03:01] And when she had finished, she had almost all the same
stars in the same pattern that I
[0:03:04 - 0:03:11] And so she wasn't able to complete the research until our astronomers found these two
stars
[0:03:39 - 0:03:45] All the
stars have been identified and making it even less likely that this is a random
[0:03:46 - 0:03:52] All 12
stars that are hooked up by solid lines or dashed lines turn out to be life candidate
[0:04:04 - 0:04:12] So what is the likelihood of finding 12
stars connected in this manner, in this huge volume
[0:04:15 - 0:04:20] And only these are the life candidate
stars in this volume and all of them have been connected
[0:05:19 - 0:05:27] As for the books and materials used, I was using the
Star catalogs that are used at the
[0:05:39 - 0:05:46] Parallax catalogs, the bright
star catalog, the EO Tricometric Parallax catalogs, supplement
[0:06:22 - 0:06:29] Finally, at two years after I
started trying to get this data, I was able to get into the
[0:08:19 - 0:08:26] a
star like the sun is going to have planets like our own or could have planets like our own.
[0:08:26 - 0:08:30] So you need a
star within a very close range of the sun and it would have to be a single
star [0:08:38 - 0:08:48] The question on the margin of error in the
stars, it would be at most when the model was
[0:09:01 - 0:09:07] Now as the
star is close to the earth the parallax measurement is much more accurate as it gets
[0:09:32 - 0:09:38] To the most of the
stars, they're very close to one catalog to another with just a
[0:09:46 - 0:09:50] The unfortunate thing is that the base
star is that it would be one of the ones where
[0:13:58 - 0:14:06] 40 and an 8th of the sky area and there were 10
stars, the side of the base
stars so 40
[0:14:47 - 0:14:54] It needs to be carried out to the 65 years at least to make sure that this
star roofing
[0:15:00 - 0:15:07] Through cities, groupings of like
stars in a catalog would be very difficult and I'll
[0:15:16 - 0:15:24] One of the just the
stars better than the absolute magnitude of plus 7.5 and the other
[0:15:57 - 0:16:03] on this before I actually go ahead and
start it to be turning the tape over now so we
[0:16:09 - 0:16:15] And I am working on is all the
stars that could have plants with life are 200 light years.
[0:16:15 - 0:16:20] I have the 65 light years listening down although I am rechecking it with the double
star [0:16:42 - 0:16:46] And so you may think you have a single
star that is really a double and first the
[0:16:49 - 0:16:54] Listening at
stars and the models should take at least a full winner if not a couple
[0:18:20 - 0:18:26] I have checked the
stars in the basic pattern in the double
star catalog which just came
[0:19:38 - 0:19:44] I had originally intended just to make the
star catalog and then I decided to be able
[0:20:04 - 0:20:12] And the writing of it took over, well I
started it in February and I didn't finish with
[0:21:41 - 0:21:46] about 20 years ago which does not amount too much except it did show me
star placements.
[0:26:21 - 0:26:39] If there is any chance of your reading the chapters in the Sagan's intelligent life in universe before we meet just the chapters on
star formation and which could have planets and planet formation.
[0:29:36 - 0:29:42] So I had
started the research years before and will be continuing it for years after probably.
[0:32:24 - 0:32:36] I'm also hoping to chip away astronomically by sending the 65 light-year list of
stars most likely to have planets with lights to Sushu Hoon, a Stefan Dole and possibly Carl Sagan.
[0:32:42 - 0:32:52] But as far as I know, no one has worked out the
stars at far are broken them into groups based on probability as my listing has done.
[0:33:54 - 0:34:05] If you are to complete my revision of the 32 light year catalog with more extensive footnotes and cross-referencing and the additional
stars found since 1957,
[0:34:23 - 0:34:32] I have the older data, there isn't too much change, just a part of light year and several
stars and the two new
stars, but I want it as up to date as possible.
[0:34:32 - 0:34:41] I want to extend the catalog of
stars possible for life to 100 light years, which means actually a complete revision.
[0:34:51 - 0:34:58] One of these would take in all the
stars out this far, there are thousands systems, or very near a thousand systems.
[0:34:58 - 0:35:07] One of these models would just have the brighter
stars because this could be done much quicker and then I can check out Betty's background
stars to see if we can place them exactly.
[0:35:14 - 0:35:24] However, I don't really expect the exact ground
stars to be as correct as the
stars with the lines to them because the ones with the lines to them were the ones that her attention was really drawn to.
[0:37:57 - 0:38:07] It should be made up of
stars most likely to have planets with life is the strongest proof that that is met represents reality that we have.
[0:38:07 - 0:38:14] When I
started this research I did it because it had not been done and I thought it should be checked, but I didn't really expect to find anything.
[0:39:58 - 0:40:10] I'm not as surprising because it was very kind when I first was interested in the youthful feel and it was because of him that I first got
started in the field through reading anatomy of a phenomenon.
[0:41:00 - 0:41:07] I think it was because I was looking at your map which must have had number two at the reticulum one
star.
[0:41:07 - 0:41:26] Another error was when I said that 107 Pisces was a G
star, it is a K
star, a range is from K-O to I think K-2 depending on the source of the information.
[0:42:23 - 0:42:36] I would think about the world authority on the planet that could have life and the
stars that could have planets with life since he does much of the original research on this.
[0:42:45 - 0:42:54] I just looked up 107 Pisces and it is generally called a K-1 main-pickland
star.
[0:43:47 - 0:44:10] Actually, if Lee's story is correct and negative Philolax, it will be a combination of the five catalog and the greasy catalog that should be able to solve the problem by taking the odd
stars and the greasy catalog and checking them out to the catalog in the Morgan-Canaan system.
[0:44:11 - 0:44:17] We should be able to spot which of these look like the remains he can
start but are subliminous.
[0:45:40 - 0:45:50] So it was the spring summer of 1967 where I first
started to try to get the data and didn't have any luck.
[0:45:50 - 0:45:55] It actually was the summer of 1968 before I was able to get the
StarCat log.
[0:48:54 - 0:49:04] I had it word it took three months to come but at least it was on its way and
starting to come at this time.
[0:49:04 - 0:49:13] Also in the summer of 1968 I got into Perkins and got a crack at the
Star catalog.
[0:49:29 - 0:49:35] It's Jerry takes months for me to
Star catalog to come and this was no exception.
[0:50:06 - 0:50:21] After Christmas in February and March I
started to combine the data that I had in a readable form so that I could send the material into RAPRO and the tiny saucer and this to give them to me in Akron.
[0:50:21 - 0:50:28] The first thing then was the
Star catalog since it is absolutely necessary to understand which
stars are which.
[0:50:29 - 0:50:44] After that the page of a radiation was done so that people could understand the
Star catalog and also a brief idea of the number of these sizes and colors and so forth so that understanding the model would be easier.
[0:51:22 - 0:51:30] Although I was on the right track I have reached the conclusion that there were many
stars that could have plants with life.
[0:51:58 - 0:52:11] However I doubt if rigor so referring could be seen I have been trying to find out for sure but I do not think that the 2% change in light could be seen at the distance that some of these
stars are.
[0:52:12 - 0:52:27] So I do not think it is rigor so referring. Now so referring in a smaller
star like a red dwarf changes its luminosity very very much in several magnitudes and facts but in one light the sun does not change greatly.
[0:52:27 - 0:52:47] So I think this variability may be more than I had first hoped also after checking the Laplata catalog they range these
stars in a 5 or 6 point spread quite often which means that different viewers are seeing them quite differently at different places.
[0:55:02 - 0:55:30] But at this time there was quite a bit I didn't know because I only had the data for about eight or nine months. One of the things that I really slipped up on this point was the SB notations I had killed the copy of the bright
star catalog and then realized that they were the specifically such a scoping binaries which I was trying desperately to find. I discovered this soon afterwards that so rather embarrassed that I hadn't caught it at that time.
[0:56:29 - 0:56:35] I was pretty excited about some of the things I was finding out about the
stars that could have plants with life.
[0:58:01 - 0:58:15] I was planning at this time of making a model of all the bright
stars within possibly 800 light years, possibly 1000 light years.
[0:58:15 - 0:58:34] I was planning to make a model of the Earth and then measuring off the taking the actual angle of elevation and the actual turn to make my own Norden type map from the various
stars that could have plants with life so we could see what their sky maps would actually look like.
[0:59:03 - 0:59:15] or model that I was planning to do with these bright
stars. This was not the normal plus minus that you have after parallax that shows the margin of error that is likely for that parallax.
[0:59:29 - 0:59:44] Dr. Nann kindly explained it to me that it was the apparent backwards movement of the
star and that it could be caused by the various
stars actually moving more than the
stars being measured.
[1:00:16 - 1:00:25] The exact title of the article is the accuracy of trigonometric parallaxes of
stars by S. Vesalveschi.
[1:02:10 - 1:02:20] And this eliminated some of the
stars that I thought were likely to have life because these some of these were subgiants rather than the main sequence
stars.
[1:02:33 - 1:02:47] but were based on luminosity that I had found back at many of these
stars are pumped together or in sheets of similar type magnitudes.
[1:04:22 - 1:04:31] I knew it was one of the
stars studied in the project DADMA and I was surprised that they would study it if there was a such a scoffic binary because they said it was a single.
[1:04:31 - 1:04:40] It turned out to be an error in the Great
Starr catalog which is extremely easy to do. I'm still catching some of my own errors.
[1:05:32 - 1:05:43] After I got home I
started correlating the data and at this time within just a few days I just sent Apple their copy of the...
[1:05:57 - 1:06:04] Then two days after this I discovered the correct viewing angle and everything
started sitting into place very neatly.
[1:06:04 - 1:06:17] I still was considering Delta and Gamma Pavle as the two-end
stars on the exploration end
stars, the lower ones.
[1:06:24 - 1:06:46] I learned too that one of these is a group four
star or a usually class that will sometimes as a five which means that this is the MK group four and five being the sequence of four being subjiant which would put it as rather unlikely for life.
[1:06:46 - 1:07:04] So I thought that possibly at this time if I could make a model of the
stars in this area since all the other
stars fit in so beautifully that these two should fit in beautifully too if I could find the
stars just outside the three to light your range that could be gone to instead of these.
[1:07:04 - 1:07:11] This would mean taking in the two next closest
stars that would be gone to from Zeta to Cana.
[1:07:11 - 1:07:32] So I made a model of this area of the sky. However these
stars were not where I was expecting them to be. The angle was sharply back and the lines appeared much shorter than should have been falling that he's met unless he is making long lines because these jumps are very long we just appear to be short.
[1:10:44 - 1:11:09] If you have a right to find one I wanted to send a greasy and one to Peter Van the camp of course one is sending to Aco since that greasy and Dr. Van the camp are the two working that I know of any way that are working mostly on these near
stars and it would be the ones that would be probably most interested in seeing the model.
[1:11:54 - 1:12:12] So I gave up this idea since the colored stereatic and chose it much better and get the better idea of the actual colors of these
stars and sizes and so forth and far simpler the only problem is to get the stereatic and to view them with.
[1:12:12 - 1:12:33] Anyway, on the fourth and fifth August I saw Betty and then saw the pictures that David Baker had drawn and
started home on the way home and the few weeks of four school
started I was correlating with the data that I got in some Betty.
[1:13:44 - 1:14:04] So does not show the correlation in the best possible way 2d pictures are very hard to interpret because you can't tell which is the small case
star close or a large case are in the background since they both would have the same diameter on the slide.
[1:14:04 - 1:14:33] I had at this time also to completely repaint the model it was out in the July 4th tornado that touched down just a few miles away from us and Chris we had high winds and high rain the models the NAFTA over several times the cats had gotten into it so I had to recheck most of the
stars positions and repaint all of the
stars before I could take it into the meeting and I wanted to take it to prick the tree.
[1:14:59 - 1:15:28] The plastic in the bottom was breaking because of the famous not supporting it and was afraid that the model would not hold up thanks giving the occasion the year before I made a quick very small mock up of the brighter
stars in the very too light year range to see if I could find a pattern using them because I couldn't wait for Christmas I knew it would take the whole Christmas vacation to do the full model.
[1:17:20 - 1:17:30] Rather than the write-
star number and the write-
star number is 483 which I quoted correctly on the tape last Sunday.
[1:18:57 - 1:19:12] These two
stars have drastic changes in their parallax and the Gleepy catalog and both of these I believe are out or at least 688 may still be in but 75 is out.
[1:19:12 - 1:19:24] Now some other
stars have been discovered in this area and about parallax measurements taken out that weren't taken before and some of these may be the correct ones.
[1:19:59 - 1:20:16] The parallax on Zeta 1 and 2 reticulum has been changed. It's not as far out as the Yale trigonometric parallax supplement had it but it's not still quite as close as what the bright
star catalog had it.
[1:20:35 - 1:20:48] Some other minor corrections are my catalog A
star which is the top
star in the hill pattern is a light
star catalog number 483 on my summary sheet.
[1:21:15 - 1:21:24] The bright
star catalog number on the left
star in the V shape at the top of the body pattern.
[1:21:25 - 1:21:49] Now in these new
stars some of these parallaxes are not trigonometric parallaxes one is just a single spectrum spectroscopic parallax and I just like placing too much reliance on a single parallax measurement especially when it is a spectroscopic rather than a trigonometric parallax.
[1:21:53 - 1:22:05] Another correction is I had said that only about a fourth of the area around the base
stars had been was on the map.
[1:22:05 - 1:22:18] Actually it is an eight there is an adding over in the other fourth at the top this is why I said it was a fourth but if we want to get it down to real brass tax there it is only an eight of the area around the base
stars.
[1:22:23 - 1:22:31] Getting back to the theory to let your model there are 16
stars that are not in it that are in the new leacy catalog.
[1:22:44 - 1:22:52] There are maybe other
stars that have parallax changes that were in the old leacy catalog that also put them in this 32 light year range but this hasn't been checked yet.
[1:22:55 - 1:23:10] Right now I am in the process going through the yellow trigonometric parallax catalog and pulling out all the
stars in a parallax of 0.049 to 0.030.
[1:23:10 - 1:23:22] This would take all the
stars from 65 light years out to 100 light years to supplement the leacy catalog so that a model can be constructed of these
stars.
[1:23:22 - 1:23:32] Now this is for my listing of
stars that could have planets with life so I am not going to be including the
stars brighter than f5.
[1:23:33 - 1:23:45] The yellow trigonometric parallax catalog does not give the groupings like the mk groupings so that you know which ones are main sequence
stars.
[1:23:45 - 1:23:50] This has to be worked out so I have to figure out the absolute magnitude for all of these
stars.
[1:23:51 - 1:24:05] About 500
stars have been marked in the catalog and I have to go back over and take out those which are spectroscopic binaries, those which have the wrong magnitude, brightness and so forth and try to figure out which of these are main sequence
stars.
[1:24:21 - 1:24:29] Now I have to figure out the number of the
stars that I have to figure out which of these are main sequence
stars.
[1:24:37 - 1:24:44] I have to figure out the number of the
stars that I have to figure out which of these are main sequence
stars.
[1:25:05 - 1:25:18] I have already worked out a two page chart that will show what the absolute magnitude is for a given visual magnitude of the given parallax within the range of the
stars that could have plants with life.
[1:25:45 - 1:25:58] I have written the Sushu Hu and twice once to send my sheet of the
stars that could have plants with life and then to send a correction sheet and also ask him where he thinks the absolute minimum should be.
[1:26:42 - 1:26:51] I am checking through this list of 500
stars to this catalog also to see what
star classification they give it.
[1:26:51 - 1:27:00] I find a great deal of discrepancy between the Eiltric and Nitric Parallax catalog and the Yashic catalog as to what the stellar spectra of these
stars is.
[1:27:01 - 1:27:15] Not only about a third of the
stars in the Eiltric and Nitric catalog of the ones that I am checking are in the Yashic catalog mainly probably because these
stars are quite dim and they are quite a ways out.
[1:27:21 - 1:27:26] They probably aren't studied as much since most of these are below visual magnitude
stars.
[1:27:27 - 1:27:34] I am running into some of those interesting dim
stars that seem to be main sequence
stars.
[1:27:34 - 1:27:51] Of course this dimness could be caused either because there is a wrong parallax measurement or there is a wrong spectra classification or it may be
stars that I am trying to see if they actually exist that could be causing the negative parallax.
[1:28:10 - 1:28:22] Once the listing on the Yashic catalog for the
stars that could have plants with life is made and then the Eiltric and Nitric prolax listing is added to it to bring the listing out to 100 light years.
[1:28:22 - 1:28:36] I will
start working on the models so that we can check what
stars, besides the ones that he has met, that the humanites assuming that they do come from there, could go to in the other areas that aren't on the math area.
[1:28:37 - 1:28:46] As soon as the model is finished then I will
start on the 65 light year model of all the
stars in the Eiltric catalog.
[1:28:51 - 1:29:01] Another problem with listing is what
stars to include in it because according to Susu Huan there is still quite a bit of discrepancy.
[1:29:02 - 1:29:13] I know what causes the planet formation and I assume this means also that they don't know for sure whether the double
stars have planets or not.
[1:29:13 - 1:29:21] If my interpretation of the math is correct they don't go to the double
stars.
[1:29:22 - 1:29:36] Even though some of these are fairly light apart and also the
stars, the individual
stars that make up a multiple system could be the right spectrum range and so forth.
[1:29:36 - 1:29:45] However the base
stars themselves, Zeta 1 and 2, retic and Duf1, a type of double system that is very wide spread.
[1:30:33 - 1:30:46] It's quite difficult to say where to draw the line between a double
star or those that just share a common proper motion because those that share a common proper motion can be revolving around each other also.
[1:30:46 - 1:30:54] So I had to know where to say that this is a single
star or this is a part of a double system.
[1:31:02 - 1:31:08] One with double
stars that have a suitable component as long as the other component is not brighter.
[1:31:08 - 1:31:20] Since it is brighter it means that the system is a young system and that any life would probably be destroyed when the other
star turns into the red giant.
[1:31:31 - 1:31:44] Here again they would have to be checked using Sushu Hohen's system for measuring the suitability for a stable orbit with double
stars.
[1:31:44 - 1:31:56] I am not about to undertake this at the present time except for listing these
stars and anyone who wants to can go through the mathematics of deciding whether it would be suitable or not.
[1:34:48 - 1:34:54] I still have a lot of work to do in the checking of these
stars and getting them listing.
[1:34:54 - 1:35:05] Another problem in listing is that the
stars in the Gleesa catalog are the 1950 epic and the
stars in the EO trigonetric and the Morgan-Canand system muddy.
[1:35:09 - 1:35:23] This means that all the
stars in those catalogs have to be changed over to the 1950 epic or the ones in the Gleesa catalog have to be changed over to the 1900 epic before they can be listed in an order.
[1:35:36 - 1:35:50] I imagine there will be at least three or four hundred
stars in the final listing in just the single
stars alone to say nothing of the double
star listing in the Sputterscopic binary listing.
[1:35:50 - 1:35:59] This is the proper motion of some of these
stars changes their position from the 1900 to the 1950 listing.
[1:36:17 - 1:36:28] Dr. Van the Count, from a very interesting packet on information on the mirror
stars and other things that arrived yesterday, which I'm very interested in at too.
[1:37:00 - 1:37:10] They normally aren't open on Saturday, but Dr. Mitchell came and let me in and we talked over the project that his students are doing with the mirror
stars.
[1:37:38 - 1:37:45] I'll be able to pin these down quite accurately once the 65 light-year model of all the
stars is made.
[1:40:31 - 1:40:42] I did some more reading in the Soul Trial, and I also did kind of a bit of work on the looking of the
stars in the E-Oltra-Gamitriq Parallax catalog.
[1:41:39 - 1:41:49] Out to 20 light years, there are a few
stars that vary from one catalog to another as much as one or two light years, but this is rare, usually it's only about half light year difference.
[1:41:49 - 1:41:59] When you get out to the 32 light years, most of the
stars are fairly stable from one measurement to another, but a few...
[1:42:20 - 1:42:38] So my listing will not be completely accurate, and this may account for some of these odd
stars that seem to be way too bright or way too dim for the parallax that they have because your absolute magnitude depends on the distance out, which of course depends on the parallax reading.
[1:42:47 - 1:43:01] And so I think probably in my total list, I'll probably include the F5 through the absolute magnitude 6.6, and even though this will extend over the range and either side, it should politely
star.
[1:43:01 - 1:43:11] So I'll probably have some that don't really qualify as the best
stars to have life, but the least should include most of the
stars that should have life.
[1:44:00 - 1:44:09] Whereas actually it wasn't really any farther from the base
stars than my A
star, which he thought seemed a little nearer.
[1:44:23 - 1:44:38] Other than the two
stars that we mentioned, then the other side of the tape, which I want to finish the model before I definitely say which two they are, these are the only major changes in the new greasy,