[0:00:05 - 0:00:10] in the United States, Deputy Directorate
CIA, Director of Naval Intelligence, and a variety
[0:04:05 - 0:04:09] Reconnaissance Office and Navy Spe
cial Program and involve US naval stations
[0:05:57 - 0:06:05] about it because the retrieval program undertaken by
CIA and elements of the US Navy
[0:06:49 - 0:06:55] The September 20 article pivots rapidly discussing multiple programs orchestrated by the
CIA's
[0:07:04 - 0:07:10] democratic oversight to retrieve advanced technologies of unknown origin. If this
CIA DS&T
[0:07:10 - 0:07:15] sounds familiar to you it is likely because this
CIA component has been accused on myriad
[0:07:21 - 0:07:27] obfuscating data around UFO retrievals. For example, Glenn Gaffney former
CIA DS&T
[0:07:38 - 0:07:45] Additionally, former
CIA DS&T Deputy Director Doug Wolf aided in founding the
CIA OGA or
[0:07:51 - 0:07:57] participating in retrievals outside of the United States with JSOC joint spe
cial operations command.
[0:08:03 - 0:08:08] Quote multiple programs are understood to be orchestrated by the
CIA's Directorate of Science
[0:08:19 - 0:08:25] Space Command, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency and Joint Spe
cial Operations Command.
[0:08:29 - 0:08:34] retrieval of objects from beneath the oceans involving the
CIA's Directorate of Operations,
[0:08:34 - 0:08:39] the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, coordinated between the
CIA and US Navy,
[0:08:40 - 0:08:44] United States Spe
cial Operations Command and submersibles from the Woods Hole Oceanographic
[0:09:30 - 0:09:38] The new bare bones edition still discussed the
CIA DSNT, DOD, and DOE, but all true actionable
[0:10:27 - 0:10:33] but expand on multiple departments and agencies named spe
cialized assets and expertise to carry out
[0:10:45 - 0:10:51] vehicles or DSRV will be a cru
cial aspect of a USO retrieval operation covered much later on in
[0:11:07 - 0:11:14] conjunction with the
CIA DSNT alongside JSOC or SOCOM forces, intelligence agencies such as the
[0:11:27 - 0:11:33] targeted role of the
CIA's Office of Global Access alongside JSOC in global soil-based crash
[0:11:33 - 0:11:39] retrievals. We can assume a similar structure for undersea retrievals where the
CIA DSNT
[0:13:26 - 0:13:32] often entwined with unacknowledged spe
cial access programs, spe
cial access programs, and controlled
[0:16:56 - 0:17:04] National Reconnaissance Officer NRO. The NRO is considered alongside the
CIA, NSA, DIA, and NGA
[0:18:51 - 0:18:59] UCF Master Sergeant Edgar Fouchet who claimed the NRO alongside the NSA and
CIA managed the TR3B
[0:19:48 - 0:19:55] from the NRO. Though the NRO likely works with the
CIA DSNT and Navy for USO retrievals they are
[0:20:06 - 0:20:12] Air Forces and
CIA's reconnaissance activities. Lessor known is an additional agency form to
[0:20:12 - 0:20:19] coordinate the
CIA's and Navy's reconnaissance activities the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office.
[0:20:32 - 0:20:38] everything we can to investigate. NRO itself has been widely considered to be a spe
cial access
[0:20:38 - 0:20:44] program according to publications made by the Asso
ciation of Former Intelligence Officers quote,
[0:21:05 - 0:21:11] capability of all spe
cial mission units of the Joint Spe
cial Operations Command. One entire
[0:21:23 - 0:21:29] being protected via a spe
cial access program but do not be mistaken NRO is a very real program
[0:21:59 - 0:22:05] NRO began during the Cold War as a joint Navy
CIA group to coordinate and fund spe
cial projects
[0:22:11 - 0:22:18] learn even more about NRO quote. In 1969 as a result of an agreement between the
CIA and US Navy
[0:22:55 - 0:23:02] designated the spe
cial Navy control program. Author Jeffrey T. Richardson was even denied FOIA
[0:23:02 - 0:23:07] requests on NRO. From what we can learn the agency has deployed several highly spe
cialized ships
[0:24:02 - 0:24:08] offi
cial said quote, I don't know why Weinberger said what he did. covert submarine operations is
[0:24:08 - 0:24:14] the most secret thing we have. The decisions were taken by a subcommittee of DIA and
CIA people
[0:24:20 - 0:24:26] operation in Swedish waters end quote. An additional high ranking
CIA officer confirmed with the
[0:24:57 - 0:25:03] established under
CIA director Richard Helms to address the sinking of the Soviet submarine K-129
[0:25:03 - 0:25:10] outside of Hawaii in 1968. Though the office was intended to act between the
CIA's director of
[0:25:10 - 0:25:16] science and technology and office of naval intelligence quote from the day NRO was formed the
CIA [0:25:16 - 0:25:21] took charge and quote, NRO has seemingly seen a tug of war of control through the
CIA and Navy
[0:25:28 - 0:25:34] serve as its director. However through NRO the Navy and
CIA DSNT's usage of the Glomar
[0:25:34 - 0:25:41] Explorer may be worth analyzing more. To address K-129 the
CIA built the ship the Glomar Explorer
[0:27:23 - 0:27:30] in 1964 achieved scientist of the spe
cial project's office of the US Navy Dr. John Pania Craven
[0:28:44 - 0:28:52] four star admiral in the US Navy from 1951 to 1982 while also serving as the NSA and
CIA director
[0:31:30 - 0:31:35] NRO dealt with technology acquisition and was also a high ranking naval offi
cial ranging from
[0:32:01 - 0:32:07] retrieval in an offi
cial capacity. But why exactly are these words from Admiral and former NRO
[0:32:53 - 0:32:58] Until recently with the openness of Admiral Timothy Gallaudet naval offi
cials quite often denied
[0:33:55 - 0:34:00] head of the National Security Agency in the United States Deputy Directorate
CIA Director of
[0:34:32 - 0:34:36] have possession of the hardware asso
ciated with this. In other words this was an actual physical
[0:34:52 - 0:34:58] Inman would tell NASA mission spe
cialist Bob Eschler Deputy Director of the
CIA DSNT Everett
[0:35:08 - 0:35:14] The Deputy Director for Science and Technology at
CIA is named Everett Heinman he is in fact
[0:36:13 - 0:36:18] Interesting how Inman a former neuro director would refer Eschler to a
CIA DSNT director
[0:36:18 - 0:36:25] for recovered anomalous vehicles.
CIA DSNT was of course one half of the founding agencies behind
[0:36:25 - 0:36:32] Neuro to note while Heinmann served as
CIA DSNT deputy director from 1979 to 1982 he would go on to
[0:36:45 - 0:36:51] Heinmann and Eschler arranged to meet at the
CIA's headquarters in Langley, Virginia 10 August 1989.
[0:37:33 - 0:37:39] as we just mentioned above program B served as the
CIA's initiative to build and operate satellites
[0:37:49 - 0:37:57] legacy programs in the 1980s out of the illustrious and infamous Pine Gap for a joint
CIA and NRO program.
[0:39:57 - 0:40:01] Eschler and insights he gained from senior Naval offi
cials, Eschler would also claim Navy
[0:40:14 - 0:40:21] only Naval offi
cials who have spoken on UFO legacy programs. In 2021, now deceased former Navy
[0:41:38 - 0:41:45] he was offi
cially briefed that America had retrieved multiple non-human craft and that he was aware
[0:42:02 - 0:42:07] offi
cial sources. This is something he'd been briefed into in his offi
cial capacity.
[0:43:09 - 0:43:16] that the American public and espe
cially Congress had the right to know what was being done with
[0:43:36 - 0:43:42] the
CIA DSNT, Navy, Neuro, Socom and others. To quote Chris in the third iteration of the article,
[0:50:40 - 0:50:47] offi
cial rescues were ever conducted. And this is due to no American subs syncing since 1971
[0:51:01 - 0:51:07] capabilities. The project was initially founded out of the Navy Spe
cial Program Office and DSRV's
[0:51:36 - 0:51:40] Chief Scientist of the Spe
cial Programs Office of the Navy and first head of the DSSP,
[0:51:44 - 0:51:49] There were many highly classified missions asso
ciated with national security that cannot be
[0:54:04 - 0:54:09] top secret equipment and teams of industry spe
cialists who would carry out unknown missions
[0:55:26 - 0:55:33] deep submergent search vehicles DSSVs that were never offi
cially built outside of mystic and avalan.
[1:09:16 - 1:09:21] offi
cials. More investigation does need to be done on this case since offi
cially DSRV's mystic
[1:09:40 - 1:09:45] Remember back to the words of Dr. John P. Craven chief scientist of the Navy Spe
cial
[1:10:56 - 1:11:03] spe
cial operations one majestic 12th manual. In this piece the Psalm 101 allegedly written in 1952
[1:11:28 - 1:11:33] spe
cial operations manual claiming new triangular extraterrestrial vehicles were being spotted at the
[1:15:23 - 1:15:29] the Majestic 12 Spe
cial Operations Manual which claims deceased biologics were taken to the right
[1:18:48 - 1:18:54] to the testimony of a sailor he had met in San Diego just weeks prior whilst on spe
cial assignment.
[1:19:41 - 1:19:48] of significant consequence here. Glomar was run by Nuro, a joint naval and
CIA DSNT effort.
[1:19:48 - 1:19:53] If this story is true, this means the Navy,
CIA, and intelligence organizations such as Nuro
[1:21:11 - 1:21:17] Naval Support Facility in Diego Gar
cia, he was exposed to the Navy conducting sensitive operations
[1:21:56 - 1:22:02] scrutiny from the public on Grume Lake. UFOs, espe
cially the TR3B reverse engineer triangle
[1:22:02 - 1:22:09] programs, were relocated to various installations including Dugway Proving Ground and Diego Gar
cia.
[1:22:25 - 1:22:31] Spe
cial Navy Control Program. Spe
cial Navy Control Program is quite similar to something called the
[1:22:31 - 1:22:38] Navy Spe
cial Program, or NSP. The NSP is a highly elusive naval office that's similar to Nuro we
[1:22:38 - 1:22:45] can only find snippets of. The first ever mention I can find of the Navy Spe
cial Program is in a 1974
[1:23:03 - 1:23:08] Navy Spe
cial Program mentioned alongside the National Reconnaissance Program, espe
cially in the
[1:23:15 - 1:23:21] Now since Nuro was created between the Navy and
CIAD S&T, you may think Navy Spe
cial Program refers
[1:23:21 - 1:23:27] to Nuro. However, the Navy Spe
cial Program is itself a very real office. Indeed, the Navy Spe
cial
[1:23:50 - 1:23:54] Here we get a keen look at the organizational structure of the Navy Spe
cial Program.
[1:23:54 - 1:23:59] The Navy Spe
cial Program was once designated to run parallel to the National Reconnaissance
[1:24:09 - 1:24:16] the Navy Spe
cial Program seen as he himself served as former ASD slash I. The NSP, according to
[1:24:16 - 1:24:22] this memorandum, serves to act for intelligence collection, similar to the NRO, DIA, or
CIA.
[1:24:28 - 1:24:34] within the NSP here, espe
cially given the time frame 1975, where throughout our investigation,
[1:24:39 - 1:24:44] Therefore, with the Navy Spe
cial Program acting as an umbrella office for numerous Navy
[1:25:06 - 1:25:12] under the Navy Spe
cial Program Office. This process for Naval UFO legacy programs would likely remain
[1:25:13 - 1:25:19] today. After all, as of 26 May 2023, we can find requests for approval for Spe
cial Access Program
[1:25:19 - 1:25:25] Facilities by the Navy Spe
cial Program Central Office. Naval legacy programs hidden within the NSP
[1:25:25 - 1:25:31] for extensive classification and compartmentalization carry sound logic, espe
cially when factoring
[1:25:47 - 1:25:53] intriguing acknowledged
CIA program that likely utilized the Navy Spe
cial Program, Project
[1:25:53 - 1:26:00] Paladium and its director Samuel Jean Potte. Potte served at the NRO
CIA DSNT as well as
[1:26:00 - 1:26:05] served as the technical director of the Navy Spe
cial Program Office, where he provided naval
[1:26:05 - 1:26:10] reconnaissance systems expertise for the
CIA Directorate of Science and Technology. Potte was a
[1:26:10 - 1:26:17] senior central intelligence agency scientific intelligence officer, inventor, teacher, and asso
ciation
[1:26:27 - 1:26:33] technical director of the Navy Spe
cial Program Office. And as the executive director of the intelligence
[1:26:33 - 1:26:38] research and development council, end quote. Under the
CIA, Potte spearheaded Project Paladium in the
[1:27:03 - 1:27:09] potte's connection to the Navy Spe
cial Program Office. According to excellent researcher Jeff Crookshank,
[1:27:54 - 1:28:00] when Dr. Albert Wheelan took over as head of
CIA DSNT, the description of Paladium would appear
[1:28:13 - 1:28:18] the
CIA was mapping the Soviet air defense system by using airborne electronic countermeasure
[1:28:58 - 1:29:04] Paladium would be discussed was within a classified manner in a 1998
CIA journal written about by
[1:29:04 - 1:29:11] the aforementioned Gene Patete. Historically, the Navy spe
cial program saw heavy compartmentalization
[1:29:11 - 1:29:18] and incredibly strict need to know access. In this 29 October 1974
CIA memo titled,
[1:29:27 - 1:29:32] overlapping certain compartmented areas of the Navy spe
cial program. For read-on access,
[1:29:32 - 1:29:37] clearance requests were required for a redacted name and National Security Council member and
CIA [1:30:07 - 1:30:12] from the Secretary of the Navy John Layman concerning the Navy spe
cial program. Remembered,
[1:30:22 - 1:30:27] include a representative from Everett Heinmann's department on the redacted spe
cial ad hoc requirements
[1:30:27 - 1:30:33] committee. Remember, Heinmann was labeled by Inman as the
CIA DS and team member knowledgeable on
[1:30:33 - 1:30:38] UFO legacy operations. The work here on the Navy spe
cial program is just the beginning for me and
[1:30:44 - 1:30:50] an attempted to contact numerous former Navy spe
cial program personnel. These include a man who
[1:30:50 - 1:30:55] served for three years as a diver in the Navy spe
cial program with the mobile diving and salvage unit
[1:30:55 - 1:31:02] one. I have also contacted one Mr. P. R who served for eight years as project lead for Navy spe
cial
[1:31:08 - 1:31:14] Chris Sharp regarding USO retrievals the Navy and so calm espe
cially intriguing scene as sharp
[1:31:33 - 1:31:38] security officer for the Navy spe
cial program and please understand I am protecting the identity
[1:32:17 - 1:32:23] Navy spe
cial program office an office of Naval research conducting under C UFO and USO crash
[1:32:29 - 1:32:36] organization such as the NRO NRO and
CIA DSNT we have also discussed myriad senior naval offi
cials
[1:36:17 - 1:36:24] naval and spe
cial us oh legacy programs this is due to multiple sources of mine informing me navy
[1:37:43 - 1:37:50] united states most highly regarded secrets we have five major intelligence agencies the
CIA,
[1:41:02 - 1:41:08] would like to tackle that case in the future espe
cially because there is testimony of the us navy