[0:03:10 - 0:03:16] shadowy US intelligence apparatuses. But does the
Navy just retrieve UFO in USOs
[0:03:34 - 0:03:40] history and key players in US UFO
Navy legacy programs. From the research we will
[0:04:05 - 0:04:09] Reconnaissance Office and
Navy Special Program and involve US naval stations
[0:05:14 - 0:05:19] investigation into UFO legacy programs under the United States
Navy. We will
[0:05:57 - 0:06:05] about it because the retrieval program undertaken by CIA and elements of the US
Navy [0:08:14 - 0:08:19] of the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, US
Navy, National Reconnaissance Office,
[0:08:34 - 0:08:39] the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, coordinated between the CIA and US
Navy,
[0:09:24 - 0:09:30] redacting all information about the
Navy, NURRO, Woods Hole, NGA, NURRO, JSOC, etc.
[0:11:02 - 0:11:07] analysis end quote. From this article, we can extract a powerful thesis, the US
Navy works in
[0:12:02 - 0:12:08] retrieval operations would be done in tandem with the US
Navy and contractors such as Lockheed Martin
[0:13:19 - 0:13:26] the non-human materials on which the program's focus. The
Navy employees numerous U-Arcs and FFRDCs
[0:14:55 - 0:15:00] according to the testimony of Randy Anderson, the
Navy, specifically the Naval Service Warfare Center
[0:15:06 - 0:15:12] at the Underground Off-World Technologies Division. The
Navy also engages in a tremendous roster of
[0:15:44 - 0:15:50] in this investigation, it is paramount to recognize the
Navy has indeed participated in at least one
[0:19:48 - 0:19:55] from the NRO. Though the NRO likely works with the CIA DSNT and
Navy for USO retrievals they are
[0:20:12 - 0:20:19] coordinate the CIA's and
Navy's reconnaissance activities the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office.
[0:21:59 - 0:22:05] NRO began during the Cold War as a joint
Navy CIA group to coordinate and fund special projects
[0:22:11 - 0:22:18] learn even more about NRO quote. In 1969 as a result of an agreement between the CIA and US
Navy [0:22:25 - 0:22:31] with Secretary of the
Navy John Warner as its first director. The office served as a means of
[0:22:55 - 0:23:02] designated the special
Navy control program. Author Jeffrey T. Richardson was even denied FOIA
[0:24:32 - 0:24:39] run in Scandinavian waters by NRO whilst directed by Secretary of the
Navy John Lehman from 1981 to
[0:25:16 - 0:25:21] took charge and quote, NRO has seemingly seen a tug of war of control through the CIA and
Navy [0:25:22 - 0:25:28] but by 1972 the
Navy regained some control of NRO seen Secretary of the
Navy John Warner
[0:25:28 - 0:25:34] serve as its director. However through NRO the
Navy and CIA DSNT's usage of the Glomar
[0:27:00 - 0:27:06] and touch on how I believe NRO provided transportation and logistics assets to the
Navy's project
[0:27:23 - 0:27:30] in 1964 achieved scientist of the special project's office of the US
Navy Dr. John Pania Craven
[0:27:30 - 0:27:35] launched the Deepse Emergent Systems project which saw the
Navy drastically improve deep sea
[0:28:44 - 0:28:52] four star admiral in the US
Navy from 1951 to 1982 while also serving as the NSA and CIA director
[0:29:27 - 0:29:33] SAIC locations. And of course Inman's dual roles within US intelligence and the
Navy also suits
[0:30:03 - 0:30:08] a productive national asset working alongside NASA, Inman was reminded of his
Navy and NSA days
[0:31:09 - 0:31:14] modern collection activities. The actual missions were conducted by the services by the US
Navy,
[0:31:35 - 0:31:40] Secretary of the
Navy to director of naval intelligence. Also recall how Inman states he was exposed
[0:32:13 - 0:32:21] directly involves US
Navy UFO legacy programs let's dive back in. In 2022 on the project Unity show
[0:39:57 - 0:40:01] Eschler and insights he gained from senior Naval officials, Eschler would also claim
Navy [0:40:14 - 0:40:21] only Naval officials who have spoken on UFO legacy programs. In 2021, now deceased former
Navy [0:40:26 - 0:40:32] service, read into a
Navy UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering program, although Cobitz
[0:40:44 - 0:40:51] that I could barely believe who he was. His name was Nat Cobitz. He was the US
Navy's former
[0:43:36 - 0:43:42] the CIA DSNT,
Navy, Neuro, Socom and others. To quote Chris in the third iteration of the article,
[0:44:15 - 0:44:20] During the Cold War 1985 to be exact, the US
Navy deployed a classified mission to investigate
[0:45:11 - 0:45:17] the
Navy, where it develops technology including ocean battle space sensors, unmanned undersea vehicles,
[0:45:59 - 0:46:05] Navy Oceanographic Research Laboratory for the Department of the
Navy. This WHOI lab is now part
[0:48:38 - 0:48:43] It was here he began doing rescue diving work on weekends alongside a
Navy crew.
[0:48:43 - 0:48:47] Mark would form a friendship with a lieutenant in the
Navy who would go on to become a commander
[0:49:52 - 0:49:58] two deep-semergence rescue vehicles that operated within the US
Navy from 1970 to 2008.
[0:50:34 - 0:50:40] with disabled submarines. The
Navy conducted numerous exercises with DSRVs-1 and-2, but no
[0:50:55 - 0:51:01] Deep Semergence Systems Project, DSSP, to increase and develop the
Navy's deep ocean engineering
[0:51:01 - 0:51:07] capabilities. The project was initially founded out of the
Navy Special Program Office and DSRV's
[0:51:36 - 0:51:40] Chief Scientist of the Special Programs Office of the
Navy and first head of the DSSP,
[0:54:20 - 0:54:26] thesis in mind. Chief scientist John Craven was tasked by the US
Navy to drastically increase
[0:54:52 - 0:54:58] So now the question must be asked was Sand Dollar the
Navy's first UFO legacy program designated
[0:55:19 - 0:55:26] End quote. From the DSSP, the
Navy plan to build six DSRV units and additional DSRVs known as
[0:55:46 - 0:55:52] I do think it is possible he and his
Navy unit were assigned to a DSSV not the two acknowledged
[1:09:40 - 1:09:45] Remember back to the words of Dr. John P. Craven chief scientist of the
Navy Special
[1:10:09 - 1:10:14] Systems project DSSP which aimed to increase and develop the
Navy's deep ocean engineering
[1:10:19 - 1:10:26] years after the October 1962 Bluegill triple prime US
Navy UFO recovery. Additionally this case
[1:14:23 - 1:14:29] even state the
Navy housed by logics such as in 1975 when Lieutenant Colonel X claimed quote
[1:14:35 - 1:14:42] Pacific Ocean. Now the US
Navy does employ multiple DOD laboratories and MRTFBs or major
[1:14:58 - 1:15:05] Richard Saudder that's similar to deep underground military bases the US
Navy employs deep underwater
[1:18:59 - 1:19:06] Great Lakes Naval Station was shot down by the
Navy between Hawaii and the mainland in June of 1973.
[1:19:48 - 1:19:53] If this story is true, this means the
Navy, CIA, and intelligence organizations such as Nuro
[1:21:11 - 1:21:17] Naval Support Facility in Diego Garcia, he was exposed to the
Navy conducting sensitive operations
[1:22:25 - 1:22:31] Special
Navy Control Program. Special
Navy Control Program is quite similar to something called the
[1:22:31 - 1:22:38] Navy Special Program, or NSP. The NSP is a highly elusive naval office that's similar to Nuro we
[1:22:38 - 1:22:45] can only find snippets of. The first ever mention I can find of the
Navy Special Program is in a 1974
[1:23:03 - 1:23:08] Navy Special Program mentioned alongside the National Reconnaissance Program, especially in the
[1:23:15 - 1:23:21] Now since Nuro was created between the
Navy and CIAD S&T, you may think
Navy Special Program refers
[1:23:21 - 1:23:27] to Nuro. However, the
Navy Special Program is itself a very real office. Indeed, the
Navy Special
[1:23:50 - 1:23:54] Here we get a keen look at the organizational structure of the
Navy Special Program.
[1:23:54 - 1:23:59] The
Navy Special Program was once designated to run parallel to the National Reconnaissance
[1:24:09 - 1:24:16] the
Navy Special Program seen as he himself served as former ASD slash I. The NSP, according to
[1:24:39 - 1:24:44] Therefore, with the
Navy Special Program acting as an umbrella office for numerous
Navy [1:25:06 - 1:25:12] under the
Navy Special Program Office. This process for Naval UFO legacy programs would likely remain
[1:25:19 - 1:25:25] Facilities by the
Navy Special Program Central Office. Naval legacy programs hidden within the NSP
[1:25:41 - 1:25:47] encounter them or was not briefed during his prestigious position within the
Navy. We can find one
[1:25:47 - 1:25:53] intriguing acknowledged CIA program that likely utilized the
Navy Special Program, Project
[1:26:00 - 1:26:05] served as the technical director of the
Navy Special Program Office, where he provided naval
[1:26:27 - 1:26:33] technical director of the
Navy Special Program Office. And as the executive director of the intelligence
[1:27:03 - 1:27:09] potte's connection to the
Navy Special Program Office. According to excellent researcher Jeff Crookshank,
[1:29:04 - 1:29:11] the aforementioned Gene Patete. Historically, the
Navy special program saw heavy compartmentalization
[1:29:27 - 1:29:32] overlapping certain compartmented areas of the
Navy special program. For read-on access,
[1:29:51 - 1:29:57] Navy rear admiral and director of Naval Intelligence John Butts. The memo thanks John for his personal
[1:30:07 - 1:30:12] from the Secretary of the
Navy John Layman concerning the
Navy special program. Remembered,
[1:30:33 - 1:30:38] UFO legacy operations. The work here on the
Navy special program is just the beginning for me and
[1:30:44 - 1:30:50] an attempted to contact numerous former
Navy special program personnel. These include a man who
[1:30:50 - 1:30:55] served for three years as a diver in the
Navy special program with the mobile diving and salvage unit
[1:30:55 - 1:31:02] one. I have also contacted one Mr. P. R who served for eight years as project lead for
Navy special
[1:31:08 - 1:31:14] Chris Sharp regarding USO retrievals the
Navy and so calm especially intriguing scene as sharp
[1:31:33 - 1:31:38] security officer for the
Navy special program and please understand I am protecting the identity
[1:32:04 - 1:32:12] as has majorly exploit has the
Navy successfully created C-faring ARV a deep C equivalent to the
[1:32:17 - 1:32:23] Navy special program office an office of Naval research conducting under C UFO and USO crash
[1:33:07 - 1:33:13] dive into how legacy operations within the
Navy are funded I have spoken before on witness Ed who
[1:34:03 - 1:34:09] clandestine UFO programs may have also occurred in the
Navy and we may get a keen look at such an
[1:34:09 - 1:34:16] instance in 1985 the US
Navy faced a massive controversy for an incredibly bizarre occurrence
[1:34:16 - 1:34:21] scandal arose when in 85 it was discovered the US
Navy had paid crumman aerospace
[1:34:21 - 1:34:29] corporation $660 a piece for ash trays to be included in the E2C Hawkeye the
Navy only began to
[1:34:40 - 1:34:45] investigation it had also been determined the
Navy was paying crumman $400 per socket wrench that
[1:34:45 - 1:34:51] were used to adjust the seats of F-14s and the
Navy had also increased payments for ground locks
[1:35:00 - 1:35:08] the
Navy had been charging itself $954 for ash trays for such infractions defense secretary
[1:36:17 - 1:36:24] naval and special us oh legacy programs this is due to multiple sources of mine informing me
navy [1:36:35 - 1:36:43] dive into the us
navy and UFO and us oh legacy program operations now as I said at the very end of
[1:36:56 - 1:37:01] why is this is it because the
navy deals with weapons technology as in the randy Anderson case
[1:37:07 - 1:37:13] or is it because the
navy specifically the on and r is a pristine stop for craft or is it because
[1:41:02 - 1:41:08] would like to tackle that case in the future especially because there is testimony of the us
navy [1:41:08 - 1:41:12] kind of coming in the us
navy divers and coming in and really taking over the retrieval operation
[1:44:10 - 1:44:16] statements and i know i say this in most videos but our work with the
navy is really just beginning
[1:44:22 - 1:44:28] because the
navy and if chris sharp reporting is correct the oh and r specifically is almost a
[1:44:40 - 1:44:46] transported again does the
navy just satisfy naval uf o legacy programs for storage of craft or do
[1:44:52 - 1:44:59] told investigated and seen is that army air force
navy almost act siloed very different programs