[0:01:39 - 0:01:45] perfect symmetric piece of metal with
marking around the edge and it was just a
[0:04:15 - 0:04:20] contractors and FFRDCs such as Lockheed
Martin for utilization of their now
[0:04:59 - 0:05:04] a naval regulation restricting
maritime UFO reporting. With that being said, let
[0:07:27 - 0:07:31] director has been labeled as the gatekeeper who ceased Lockheed
Martin's attempts to divest
[0:08:08 - 0:08:14] and Technology and its Directorate of Operations including its
maritime branch. Alongside components
[0:12:02 - 0:12:08] retrieval operations would be done in tandem with the US Navy and contractors such as Lockheed
Martin
[0:15:12 - 0:15:19] programs with FFRDC's well worth our interest. Pri
marily the Center for Naval Analysis run by the
[0:22:05 - 0:22:11] conducted by sub
marines. In his book the US Intelligence Committee Jeffrey T. Richardson was able to
[0:22:31 - 0:22:36] managing the conduct of sub
marine intelligence missions and exploitation of their product.
[0:22:36 - 0:22:42] Those missions involved the recovery of sunk-in sub
marines the Soviet K-129 taping of the underwater
[0:22:49 - 0:22:55] a program named desktop an imagery and sicken collection from sub
marines a program at one time
[0:23:07 - 0:23:14] and sub
marines including the USS Parche the Hughes-Glomer Explorer the USS Halibut the NR-1
[0:23:20 - 0:23:27] sub
marine launched 1969 the same year as NRO's founding and retired in 2008 the NR-1. This sub
[0:23:45 - 0:23:51] carrier. NRO seemingly performed operations to swarm a stranded Soviet sub
marine in 1981 in
[0:23:57 - 0:24:02] stating NRO's sub
marine operations in Swedish waters were routine defense tests a senior U.S.
[0:24:02 - 0:24:08] official said quote, I don't know why Weinberger said what he did. covert sub
marine operations is
[0:24:26 - 0:24:32] International Peace Research Institute Oslo that US covert sub
marine retrieval operations were
[0:24:39 - 0:24:45] 1987. Analyzing the inception of NRO and the retrieval of the K-129 Soviet sub
marine as detailed
[0:24:51 - 0:24:57] retrieval missions. In Blind Man's Bluff the untold story of American sub
marine espionage NRO was
[0:24:57 - 0:25:03] established under CIA director Richard Helms to address the sinking of the Soviet sub
marine K-129
[0:25:28 - 0:25:34] serve as its director. However through NRO the Navy and CIA DSNT's usage of the Glo
mar [0:25:34 - 0:25:41] Explorer may be worth analyzing more. To address K-129 the CIA built the ship the Glo
mar Explorer
[0:25:55 - 0:26:01] medium author underscored for this great piece titled General Motors Glo
mar Explorer Lockheed
Martin
[0:26:01 - 0:26:06] and UAP Connections his article will be in the video description. The piece explores the Glo
mar [0:26:06 - 0:26:12] Explorer being involved in hidden programs beyond the scope of K-129 Soviet sub
marine recovery
[0:26:12 - 0:26:18] in 1974 and was additionally used for nearly two decades by Lockheed
Martin. Since the ship was a
[0:26:18 - 0:26:24] NRO creation we can reasonably assume these clandestine operations and Lockheed
Martin's usage
[0:26:30 - 0:26:36] contractor was Lockheed Missiles and Space Company now Lockheed
Martin. Least the Glo
mar Explorer
[0:26:41 - 0:26:47] Glo
mar additionally partake in these under C UFO retrievals. After all later in this project we will
[0:26:47 - 0:26:54] address a synolyte in 1970's UFO crash retrieval case in which the Glo
mar Explorer allegedly retrieved
[0:27:16 - 0:27:23] continental shelf in deepest
marine environments. Sand Dollar seemingly gained actionable leverage when
[0:30:20 - 0:30:25] to out s
mart adversaries. Later on in the interview Inman touched on his role as director of
[0:30:58 - 0:31:03] it had been engaged in the efforts to pick up a sub
marine off the ocean floor with the Glo
mar [0:31:03 - 0:31:08] Explorer. By the time I took over it was pri
marily designed to track the hardware to be used in
[0:31:14 - 0:31:19] by the sub
marine force, by the national security agency. I had already been exposed to the Glo
mar [0:31:40 - 0:31:49] to NRO's Glo
mar Explorer in Hawaii. In 1974 the K129 Soviet wreckage was picked up 1560 miles
[0:31:54 - 0:32:01] recovery in 1973 conducted by the Glo
mar in Hawaii could Inman possibly have been involved in this
[0:44:09 - 0:44:15] research and higher education facility is dedicated to the study of
marine science and engineering.
[0:48:20 - 0:48:25] On this live radio call and show, Art Bell was contacted by a retired
Marine Corps lieutenant
[0:48:25 - 0:48:31] Colonel. The caller, first name
Mark, had been assigned to 22 Area Camp Pendleton to work with the
[0:48:43 - 0:48:47] Mark would form a friendship with a lieutenant in the Navy who would go on to become a commander
[0:50:22 - 0:50:28] sub
marines within 72 hours. These highly advanced submersibles employed a guidance system more
[0:50:34 - 0:50:40] with disabled sub
marines. The Navy conducted numerous exercises with DSRVs-1 and-2, but no
[0:52:50 - 0:52:55] importance from the seafloor of the continental shelf in deep
marine environment. According to
[0:53:59 - 0:54:04] need for maximum security for these sub
marines because they themselves, quote, they only transported
[0:55:39 - 0:55:46] clandestine operations with an operational depth of 20,000 feet. So while we dive into
Mark's story,
[0:55:52 - 0:55:58] mystic and avalan DSRVs if this is the case no such vessel in which
Mark was operating was ever
[0:56:23 - 0:56:28] this retrieval incident would have taken place. Let us also account for some error in
Mark's
[0:57:04 - 0:57:09] location at which this retrieval is alleged to have occurred.
Mark's DSRV crew had been sent from
[0:57:20 - 0:57:26] ready deep submergence rescue vehicle. On the DSRV,
Mark served to operate computer equipment on
[0:57:31 - 0:57:36] with mechanical arms and rigging for object retrieval.
Mark's team was dispatched after a survey
[0:57:47 - 0:57:51] thought this to be a crashed foreign nuclear sub
marine. However, the radar signature had shown the
[0:57:51 - 0:57:57] object to be smaller than any known nuclear sub. Upon diving,
Mark's DSRV attempted to contact the
[0:59:07 - 0:59:18] a mile and a half. We contacted the vessel which we immediately recognized not as a sub
marine,
[1:00:48 - 1:00:56] in color. It had some
markings on the side. Sir, listen, I'm coming to a break at the top of the
[1:01:26 - 1:01:32] Mark and his crew had no matching craft or pattern to cross reference this craft. The 60 to 70
[1:01:43 - 1:01:48] origins.
Mark and his lieutenant colonel friend both thought the craft to be extra terrestrial but
[1:02:01 - 1:02:05] We do need to quickly address the
markings on the side of the craft that
Mark relayed.
[1:02:06 - 1:02:11] And there were
markings on the side of it which were in the in the skin itself.
[1:02:12 - 1:02:18] And how would you describe those
markings? You know, and I've heard this before, people try to say
[1:02:18 - 1:02:26] hieroglyphics and all of this, it was not any language or
marking which we would typically see
[1:03:48 - 1:03:54] the DSRV crew was ordered to dive again this time taking a
marine archaeologist. The archaeologist
[1:04:10 - 1:04:18] recovering. As I said we took down a
marine archaeologist and one thing that was very interesting
[1:07:02 - 1:07:07] vehicle was recovered
Mark got a clear look at the craft it proved to be six to eight feet longer
[1:07:07 - 1:07:14] than an F-14 at 62 feet meaning this craft was 68 to 70 feet long.
Mark stated nothing like that
[1:08:24 - 1:08:31] that technology would not allow you to fly to craft 30 or 40 years ago. Within four hours
Mark and his
[1:08:31 - 1:08:37] entire crew were steamed off site.
Mark received no feedback or debriefing on what the vehicle was
[1:08:43 - 1:08:48] Mark did state when he joined the DSRV team he was ordered to sign some pretty lengthy NDAs.
[1:08:48 - 1:08:54] As we know from Dr. Craven and DSRV for clandestine usage this does not come as a shock
Mark would
[1:08:54 - 1:09:00] be subject to such intense secrecy regarding his work on the DSRV.
Mark stated even if the DSRV
[1:09:06 - 1:09:11] the retrieval by the Naval Lieutenant Colonel and
Mark told Bell he would connect him with the Naval
[1:11:15 - 1:11:21] the
marine archaeologist claimed the triangle had been buried for 30 to 40 years meaning the crash
[1:15:55 - 1:16:01] This story took place at the Naval Air Base Yuma Arizona now called the
Marine Corps Air Station Yuma
[1:16:41 - 1:16:47] Witness Pete, a former US
Marine, claimed to have photographed a saucer-like craft at the Naval
[1:17:42 - 1:17:49] at the Great Lakes Naval Base from
March 1973 to September 1974 destined for intelligence school.
[1:19:24 - 1:19:31] by the Glo
mar Explorer and shipped to Hawaii and sent stateside and finally to Chicago.
[1:19:36 - 1:19:41] But just hold on a second here, the claims of the Glo
mar Explorer retrieving the craft are
[1:19:41 - 1:19:48] of significant consequence here. Glo
mar was run by Nuro, a joint naval and CIA DSNT effort.
[1:22:19 - 1:22:25] and discussion of Imagent and Sigant Collection from Sum
marines. A program at one time designated the
[1:26:38 - 1:26:45] 1960s with heavy use of naval assets, ships, and sub
marines. The project employed a variety of
[1:26:45 - 1:26:51] clandestine sub
marines, radar reflectors, and jamming tactics to trick, engage Soviet radar
[1:31:14 - 1:31:20] implicated Lockheed
Martin Dry submersible as participating in USO retrieval and since 2023,
[1:31:20 - 1:31:26] so calm has declared operational capability with Lockheed
Martin Dry submersible and finally I have
[1:32:23 - 1:32:29] retrievals alongside so calm private entity such as Lockheed
Martin and Woods Hole an intelligence
[1:35:39 - 1:35:47] 735 sub
marine were in excess of $96 million or 22% where was all this excess money on contracts
[1:37:38 - 1:37:43] underwater reconnaissance underwater reconnaissance systems clandestine sub
marines are some of the
[1:38:07 - 1:38:15] article about under c retrievals in the onr j-soc so com locking
martin woods hole and NRO this
[1:39:03 - 1:39:12] mar explorer the halibut the nr run nr one the sea wolf there is so much secrecy surrounding NRO
[1:39:12 - 1:39:18] and that bridge is really perfectly into the 1991 retrieval case under witness
mark now as i
[1:39:23 - 1:39:29] identify
mark to try to identify the naval lieutenant commander and trying to track down those
[1:39:34 - 1:39:42] but i am trying to track that down so
mark story involves a dsrv or as i hypothesized from
[1:39:56 - 1:40:04] because dsrv was specifically created for transfer of crew from a sub
marine where a dssv was specifically
[1:40:24 - 1:40:29] mark's case the original side scan from vessels and other vessels that picked up the signature of
[1:40:41 - 1:40:47] is interesting to see as
mark said he steamed out of virginia that the 2011 Fukushima documents
[1:41:12 - 1:41:19] but
marks dsrv crew observes a triangle and as i said in the video and as we talk about in this
[1:42:04 - 1:42:12] etc what interests me is the the aftermath of the retrieval
mark states that after the
marine
[1:42:17 - 1:42:22] ground and retrieve it that after a couple hours
mark and his crew were steamed off site and were
[1:42:27 - 1:42:32] and ds now
mark inherently had to sign and ds and not disclosure agreements for his work on dsrv
[1:42:55 - 1:43:01] from
marking his crew to be steamed off site and they were never briefed on the incident debrief
[1:43:01 - 1:43:06] to discuss it further i do hope
mark is still alive and i would like to speak to him i very much would
[1:43:13 - 1:43:20] naval station case of course stringfield published on this back in the 80s so the glo
mar explorer
[1:43:20 - 1:43:26] and its work with nuro wasn't very well known if at all at this time the glo
mar explorer had been
[1:43:26 - 1:43:32] known for project azorean retrieving one third of the soviet k129th sub
marine but just the
[1:43:49 - 1:43:56] and retrieved by the glo
mar explorer and this was night early 1973 and then there's fascinating
[1:44:03 - 1:44:10] of the glo
mar's activities out in hawaii so there's a lot of really connective tissue here with these