Key Themes & Topics Discussed:

Underwater UAP/Civilizations: A major focus is the possibility of UAP activity occurring underwater and the speculation about a potential civilization residing beneath the ocean. They suggest this is a logical hiding place for advanced entities.
Specific Anomalies & Locations:
Baltic Anomaly: They discuss verifying the existence and composition of this underwater object.
Cuban Atlantis: They highlight a purported underwater structure 13 nautical miles off Cuba, noting the lack of independent verification.
Puerto Rico: Mentions high levels of UAP activity in the Puerto Rico area.
Varianian Stuff: James Fox (UFO researcher) is seeking information and corroboration regarding something called "the varianian stuff" (details are vague).
Drone/UAP Behavior: They analyze video footage, commenting on anomalous behavior like:
Speed and lack of wake: UAPs appearing to move quickly underwater without creating a typical wake.
Splitting into multiple objects: Observing instances of what appears to be a single UAP splitting into several. This is considered highly unusual.
Challenges of Verification: They emphasize the difficulty of verifying UAP sightings and the need for independent corroboration. They acknowledge the prevalence of misinformation and the importance of skeptical analysis.
Whistleblower Support: Logan mentioned his app and fund designed to encourage and support whistleblowers with UAP-related information.

Key Points from Each Guest:

Jason T. Sands: A UAP investigator/researcher, active on X (formerly Twitter). Seems to be focused on investigative work.
Logan: Has an app (phenom.earth) and a fund to help facilitate the coming forward of whistleblowers. Also involved in analyzing UAP footage.

Overall Tone:

The conversation is a serious discussion among people who take the UAP phenomenon seriously. They approach the topic with a mixture of skepticism, curiosity, and a desire for verifiable data. They are interested in finding legitimate evidence and uncovering the truth, while acknowledging the complexities and challenges involved. There’s a clear acknowledgement of the ridicule often associated with the topic and a call for more open-minded investigation.